In the US, the debate over how much the Federal and state governments should control the employment relationship between employers and employees rages on. Currently, a mandatory sick leave requirement is under consideration in the Pandemic Protection for Workers, Families, and Businesses Act.
The Act would require that all employers with more than 15 employees offer full-time workers seven days of paid sick leave, and part-time employees a proportionate share based on hours worked. Employees could also use the time to care for children when daycare is closed and to take a child to the doctor even if the child is not ill.
While the Act is for infectious diseases, I have no doubt its implications are much broader. My readers generally disagree vociferously with me on this topic, and some readers agree with me just as strongly. I do not believe that government should mandate sick leave, and I believe that nations that do offer paid sck leave and other time off benefits, have suffered consequences, such as more unemployment and less productivity - and the studies generally back this point of view.
Would I like to see every employee have a solid benefits package? Absolutely. The entire theme of this website is forward thinking Human Resources, but I would rather see people have jobs.
With current unemployment at 10.2% and 17.5%, if you are willing to account for people who have given up looking, legislated employer mandates are a burden on job creation and job preservation. Indeed, in addition to the general uneasiness experienced by the business community, rising unemployment taxes, to deal with the legions of the unemployed, are further hindering job creation.
My home state, Michigan, has the highest unemployment in the nation - 15.1% without taking into consideration those who have stopped looking. Teenage unemployment nationally is currently 27%. Sure, let's mandate a proportionate number of paid sick days for these kids; good luck job hunting.
Stop with the new demands on employers, and the threatened new demands on employers, and you'll see job creation and job security rise quickly. But, you won't see serious job creation until the government backs off on the debt employers will assume through programs such as national health care reform, rising unemployment insurance rates, and higher business taxes at both the state and Federal levels.
Your comments are always welcome.
Image Copyright Kelly Young
All Topics | Most Popular | Newsletter | HR Forum
Be a Technorati Fan | Follow Me On Twitter
I recently heard a horror story about a retail worker who was recently fired for burning through all his sick time, and the company offered nothing in terms of guidance or training to help their associates who are in constant contact with a flu infected public public how to stay healthy and reduce their exposure.
If companies want to avoid legislation like this, they need to be much better corporate citizens, and be more forward thinking and flexible during pandemics.
The problem rests in that every worker is out to get the most. They don’t care that THEIR ability to have 7 paid sick days hinders someone else from getting a job. THEY have a job, so more power to them. I see very little concern anywhere (workplace, customer base, forum discussion) from individuals working with benefits for those who are not working or don’t have benefits. It’s an extremely selfish society we live in that cares only for what I can get no matter the cost to someone else. Therefore, we are faced with dilemmas such as this: my younger siblings and friends graduating from school are unable to land a job and pay for their education because my generation and those ahead of me would LOVE to have more paid sick days so that when we don’t feel like working one day, we can just call in sick and still get paid for it. Never mind we’re screwing the system. It’s sick.
Sorry, but the data does not support your views. I suggest you read the study you’ve underlined.